Doli Bibi @ Ohida @Oheda Khatun v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

rkd 10.12.2020 Ct. No.28 (Allowed) C.R.M. 10118 of 2020 (Through Video Conference) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Pingla P.S. Case No. 285 of 2020 dated 15/09/2020 under Section 448/323/325/307/354B/341/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Doli Bibi @ Ohida @ Oheda Khatun ....petitioner.

Mr. R. Mukherjee ...for the petitioner.

Mr. R. Mukherjee, Mr. S. Banerjee ...for the State.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there are civil litigations pending by and between the parties. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

We have considered the materials on record. As nature of injuries do not appear to be grievous from the medical papers, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)