← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/10323/2020allowed

Goutam Adhikary v. State Of West Bengal

2020-12-15Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi (27.06.2011 - 29.08.2020),Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh2 pages

15.12.2020 Sl. No.124 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. 10323 of 2020 [via video conferencing] In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 07.12.2020 in connection with Bhaktinagar Police Station Case No.850 of 2020 dated 01.10.2020 under Sections 406/468/471/506/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. (G.R. Case No.4278 of 2020) And In Re: Goutam Adhikary ... ... Petitioner Mr. Hillol Saha Podder .. Advocate ... ... for the petitioner Mr. Aditi Sankar Chakraborty .. Ld. Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Tapan Bhattacharjee .. Advocate Mr. Sagnik Sankar Sikdar .. Advocate ... ... for the State There is a family dispute over share in ancestral property. Alleged forged instrument is in the control and custody of the investigating agency. In view of the aforesaid facts, we are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the accused/petitioner may not be necessary and he may be granted anticipatory bail however, subject to strict conditions.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioner, namely Goutam Adhikary, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the said petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a week until further orders.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)