← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/10326/2020allowed

Satyam Mal And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2020-12-15Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi (27.06.2011 - 29.08.2020),Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh2 pages

15.12.2020 Sl. No.125 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. 10326 of 2020 [via video conferencing] In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 04.12.2020 in connection with Margram Police Station Case No.124 of 2020 dated 02.10.2020 under Sections 448/323/324/325/326/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. (G.R. Case No.988 of 2020) And In Re: Satyam Mal @ Saptam Mal & Anr.

... ... Petitioners Mr. Bitasok Banerjee .. Advocate ... ... for the petitioners Mr. Binay Panda .. Advocate Mr. Subham Bhakat .. Advocate ... ... for the State Leave is granted to the learned advocate-on-record for the petitioners to correct the cause title of the application in course of this day.

Chandan Mal, a co-accused is the principal assailant. He is presently in custody. Keeping in mind the extent of complicity of the petitioners in the alleged crime, we are inclined in granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioners, namely (1) Satyam Mal @ Saptam Mal & (2) Sonali Mal, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)