Sudip Mandal v. Joseph Lawrence And ORS.

09 & 10 28.01.2021 KC CPAN 657 of 2020 In WPA 6432 of 2020 with CAN 1 of 2020 (Old CAN No. 5061 of 2020) with CAN 2 of 2020 (CAN 2 of 2020 not found) Sudip Mandal Vs.

Joseph Lawrence & Ors.

Mr. Srijan Nayak Ms. Rituparna Maitra Mr. Arindam Mitra.

... for the petitioner.

Mr. Kamalesh Bhattacharya.

... for the Bank.

The Court is informed that subsistence allowance to the petitioner was paid.

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that, the entire claim on account of subsistence allowance has not been paid.

In a contempt petition, the Court need not enter into the arena as to whether or not the entirity of the subsistence allowance was paid or not. The petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps so far as his claim on account of subsistence allowance and on account of other claims are

concerned.

CPAN 657 of 2020 is disposed of without any order as to costs.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)