Rupnarayan Sarkar v. Rajesh Kumar Sinha And ANR

24.02.2021 p.b.

Sl. No.200 CPAN 669 of 2020 With W.P.A. 20843 of 2019 Mr. Rupnarayan Sarkar Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Srinjay Sengupta, Mr. Saurav Roy, Mr. Narattam Acharyya, Mr. Ankush Ghosh, Mr. Sounak Sengupta.

.......for the petitioner.

Mr. Soumya Masumder, Mr. Niladri Bhattacharjee, Mr. Soham Bandyapadhyay.

........for the Contemnor.

The affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept on record.

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that certain payment has been made in terms of the order dated 18th November, 2019. The petitioner, however, submits that the payment was not made in accordance with the direction made in the said order. The direction was passed for payment on interest as mentioned in the memo from the date of its approval till the date of actual payment. The petitioner submits that the interest has been calculated and paid till the year 2008. The petitioner submits that the same ought to have

been calculated till the date it was actually paid to the petitioner in the year 2021.

The aforesaid contention of the petitioner cannot be looked into or decided by the Court sitting in the contempt jurisdiction.

In view of the above, the contempt application being CPAN 669 of 2020 stands disposed of.

The petitioner will be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of the grievance, if so advised.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)