Sumit Nath Roy v. Union Of India And ORS.

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

25.02.2026 Ct. No. 5 S.L. No. 43 SM WPA 9 of 2026 Sumit Nath Roy

Versus

Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Sudipto Kumar Mazumder, ld. DSGI Mr. Tridip Saha Mr. Sourav Kar .....for the Railway Authority 1.

None appears for the petitioner on call.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner is not interested in the matter as the writ has become infructuous.

3.

Considering the same, the writ application is dismissed for default.

4.

Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

5.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

6.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

[Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]