Mobarak Miya v. The State Of West Bengal

17/03/2026 D/L - 16 Court No.6 S. Kundu Rejected

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRM (A) 69 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Kumargram P.S case no. 255 of 2025 dated 23/10/2025 under sections 109/117(2)/85 of the BNS.

In the matter of: Mobarak Miya

...Petitioner.

Mr. H. S. Poddar ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Tapan Bhattacharyya Mr. Dhiman Sil ...for the State.

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The marriage between the petitioner and the alleged victim took place about six years ago.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the statements of neighbours as well as the injury report which records the injury as grievous in nature. It appears that there was a burn marks on the right hand, other bleeding injuries on leg and swelling on the scalp.

3. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider

this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)