← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(A)/108/2022disposed

Amena Khatun And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2022-02-24Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI 24.02.2022 Sl. JCB1 Court No.29 sourav (Allowed) C.R.M. (A) 108 of 2022 (Via Video Conference) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 18.02.2022 in connection with Haldibari P. S. Case No. 261 of 2021 dated 29.10.2021 under Sections 498A/304B of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Amena Khatun & Anr.

....petitioner.

Mr. Madhushri Dutta ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty Mr. Tapan Bhattacharjee ...for the State.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the husband was enlarged on bail. The police filed charge-sheet. State is represented.

Considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet and considering the advance age of the petitioners, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date and on further conditions that the petitioners shall appear before the court below on every date fixed for hearing.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

C.R.M. (A) 108 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)