Maksedul Md. @ Maksab Md v. The State Of West Bengal

24.03.2021 BPG Calcutta High Court In The Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri CRM 338 of 2021 (Via Video Conference) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Rajganj Police Station Case No.284 of 2019 dated 04.09.2019 under Sections 143/332/325/326/307/186/353 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3 of the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984. And In the matter of: Maksedul Md. @ Maksab Md.

.... Petitioner Mr. Debajit Kundu ... For the Petitioner Mr. Kallol Acharjee, Mr. Biswarup Roy.

... For the State Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Having regard to the nature of injury as apparent from the case records, we are of the opinion that the petitioner should be granted the benefit of anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed subject to the conditions that in the event of arrest the petitioner will be released on bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and the petitioner will report to the investigating officer as and when called for. Petitioner will comply with the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM 338 of 2021, is allowed.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Kausik Chanda, J.)