← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(A)/181/2023allowed

Suniti Adhikari @ Sumati Adhikari And ANR v. The State Of West Bengal

2023-04-04Hon'Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj,Hon'Ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)2 pages

CIRCUIT BENCH OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT AT JALPAIGURI 04.04.2023 Court No.1 (D/L 41) (allowed) CRM (A) 181 OF 2023 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed on 03.03.2023 in connection with Pundibari Police Station Case No.583 of 2022 dated 16.10.2022 under Sections 498A/302/304B/201 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,1961. And In the matter of: Suniti Adhikari @ Sumati Adhikari & Anr. ... Petitioners.

Mr. Hillol Saha Poddar Ms. Mousumi Das ... for the petitioners.

Mr. Tapan Bhattacharjee Mr. Kallol Nag ... for the State.

The present petitioners are the father-in-law and the mother-inlaw of the deceased. Charge-sheet in the present case has been filed on 09.01.2023 under Sections 498A/304B read with Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned public prosecutor placing the case diary has brought the notice of the Court to the statements recorded under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C and the other materials on record. From the post-mortem report, it is found that the deceased died of hanging. Charge-sheet has been filed in the present case and investigation is prima facie complete. Further detention of the father-in-law and the mother-in-law in custody is not necessary. Accordingly the petitioners are granted

bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of Rs.2,500/- amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Coochbehar and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 The application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, allowed. [SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.] (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)