Susmita Chakraborty v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS

JPD-45 20.04.2026 Ct. No.06 spal

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 595 of 2026 SUSMITA CHAKRABORTY Vs.

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Mr. Avimannu Das, Adv.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Momenur Rahaman, Adv.

Mr. Bikash Singha, Adv.

...for the State respondents.

1. The grievance of the petitioner is directed against non-consideration of a request for transfer.

2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that despite having sought for a transfer the respondent authorities, i.e., the respondent no.3 has been unable to consider the representation of the petitioner.

3. On behalf of the State respondents it is submitted that they have no objection to the representation being considered by the respondent no.3.

4. In view of the above, WPA/595/2026 stands disposed of by directing the respondent no.3 to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.

5. It is made clear that there has been no adjudication on the merits of the case for the respondent no.3 to consider strictly in accordance with law.

(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)