Rajendra Prasad Sitani And ANR v. The State Of West Bengal And ANR

13-11-2024 Court No.3 Suppl. 1 T.Ojha In The High Court At Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri CRR/97/2024 RAJENDRA PRASAD SITANI AND ANR.

VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

Mr. Avijit Chowdhury, Adv.

...for the Petitioners The necessary corrections are made in the Order dated 11th November, 2024, which are as follows:- In the second paragraph at page 2 instead of "...the mother-in-law were leaving at Chennai. In nutshell, it is submitted that even if there be any strife between the husband and the wife, the present petitioners are no way connected wiht that.", it should be read as ""...the mother-in-law were living at Chennai. In nutshell, it is submitted that even if there be any strife between the husband and the wife, the present petitioners are no way connected with that."

In the seventh line of the fifth paragraph at page 2 instead of word "Swiping" it should be read as "Sweeping".

In the third line of the second paragraph at page 3 instead of "Siliguri Women P.S. Case No. 373" it should be read as "Siliguri Women P.S. Case No. 73" and in the ninth line instead of "The petitioner nos. 1 and 4 are at", it should be read as "The petitioner no. 1 is at".

The corrected copy of the Order may be uploaded.

(SUGATO MAJUMDAR, J.)