Bimal Sarkar v. The State Of West Bengal And ANR

03.07.

CRR 80 of 2021 Bimal Sarkar.

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

Mr. Debajit Kundu, Mr. Subhankar Dutta ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, APP.

Mr. Aniruddha Biswas.

... for the State.

Both the learned advocates appearing on behalf of Ct rup the parties are present.

From the prayer of revisional application it is found that revisional application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer for execution of judgment and order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Curt, Jalpaiguri in connection with return of seized money amounting to Rs. 22,50,000/-.

On careful perusal of the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Jalpaiguri, it is found that petitioner was acquitted and return of sized currency was ordered. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, I am of the opinion, that petitioner is to make prayer before the learned Trial Court for non-compliance with the order passed by that Court.

Petitioner is at liberty to draw the attention of the learned Trial Judge i.e. learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Jalpaiguri for non-compliance of the order passed by the learned Court regarding release of currency note.

With the aforesaid observation and direction the revisional application stands disposed of.

Let the Trial Court Record, if there be any, be sent back immediately.

All parties to this revisional application shall act on the server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)