← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/35/2025allowed

Sazimuddin Mia@Saji Miah@ Sajimuddin Miah v. The State Of West Bengal

2025-04-11Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh3 pages

03.

11.04.2025 Court No.1 (Tanmoy) Allowed CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

APPELLATE SIDE CRM (M) 35 of 2025 In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising out of Pundibari Police Station Case No.245/2024 dated 20.4.2024 under Sections 341/326/307/506/34 of IPC, 1860 adding Section 302 of IPC, 1860.

And In the matter of: - Sazimuddin Mia @ Saji Miah @ Sajimuddin Miah ...petitioner.

Mr. Jagriti Mishra Ms. Ananya Bhattacharya Ms. Mrinmoyee Das Ms. Shreya Sarkar ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, APP Mr. Kallol Nag ...for the State.

1. The petitioner is one out of several accused persons. He says that he had no intention of harming anybody. A dispute arose between the accused persons and the victims. That led to the alleged incident. A similarly circumstanced accused person by the name of Subhash Chandra Roy @ Tena Roy has been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench by an order dated April 10, 2025, passed in CRM (M) 30 of 2025. He prays for bail on the ground of parity.

2. Learned State Counsel, while opposing the bail prayer, draws my attention to the statements of witnesses recorded under Section of the Criminal Procedure Code, (corresponding to Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

Sanhita, 2023). The deceased victim's wife does not name this petitioner. However, another witness does take this petitioner's name but no overt act has been attributed to him.

3. On an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and seeing that charge-sheet has already been submitted upon completion of investigation and also a coaccused person, who appears to be similarly circumstanced as the petitioner, has been granted bail, I am of the view that the further custodial detention of the petitioner is not necessary.

4.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner, namely, Sazimuddin Mia @ Saji Miah @ Sajimuddin Miah, shall be released on bail, upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Coochbehar, subject to condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on each and every date of substantive hearing subject to the provisions of Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 355 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

5.

In the event the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions stipulated above without any justifiable cause, his

bail shall stand automatically cancelled without further reference to this Court.

6. The application for bail being CRM (M) 35 of 2025 is accordingly disposed of.

7. Criminal Section is directed to supply urgent photostat certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Arijit Banerjee, J.)