Anita Roy v. Randhir Kumar And ANR

08.11.2024 Item No.01 RP Ct. No.7 In The High Court at Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri From Principal Bench WPCRC 6 of 2024 in CPAN 26 of 2024 with WPA 28 of 2024 Smt. Anita Roy Vs.

Mr. Randhir Kumar & Anr.

Mr. Saktipada Jana ...... for the Petitioner Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, AGP Mr. Nilay Baran Mandal ......for Contemner No.1 Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee Mr. Saptak Sanyal ......for Contemner No.2 1.

Pursuant to the rule the contemner no.2 is physically present in Court and the contemner no.1 appears through virtual mode. The contemner no.1 is being represented by Mr. Vaisya, learned advocate and the contemner no.2 is being represented by Mr.

Chatterjee, learned Advocate.

2.

Learned advocates for the respective contemners uniformly submit that the order dated January 5, 2024 passed in WPA 28 of 2024 has been complied with and E-Pension Payment Order dated 1st October,2024 has been issued.

3.

Mr. Jana, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received the benefits in terms of the Pension Payment Order. 4.

In view of the aforesaid, the contempt application stands disposed of. The Rule stands discharged. (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)