Aparna Ray@Aparna Roy v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS
18.06.2026 Sl. No.20 Ct. No.6 gd
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA/945/2026 Aparna Ray @ Aparna Roy Vs The State of West Bengal and Ors.
Mr. Debajit Kundu ..for the Petitioner.
Ms. Supriya Singh Mr. Samar Rakshit ..for the State.
1.
Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
2.
By the present writ petition the petitioner seeks direction upon the respondent authorities to disburse the interest on gratuity and arrear pension amount from the date following the date of death of the concerned employee till the date of actual payment at the rate of 18% per annum.
3.
The petitioner contends that her husband late Ramesh Chandra Ray, was a Karmee of Jateswasr Gram Panchayet, Village and Post OfficeJateswasr, Police Station-Falakata, District-Jalpaiguri under Falakata Block. The petitioner's husband retired from service on superannuation on 28th February, 2015. The pension payment order was issued on 2nd
March, 2016. The gratuity and arrear pension was disbursed on 8th May, 2016.
The petitioner's husband expired on 16th April, 2025. However, no interest on the aforesaid amount has been paid. Hence this writ petition. 4.
Mr. Debajit Kundu, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that there is a delay in disbursement of the aforesaid amount and as such the petitioner is entitled to receive interest on the delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension. He seeks for appropriate orders.
5. Ms. Supriya Singh, learned advocate for the State leaves the matter to the discretion of this Court.
6. Though there is delay in making such claim, however, delay per se cannot defeat the valuable right of the petitioner. Relief may be granted to the writ petitioner in spite of the delay if it does not affect the right of third parties. (See: Union of India vs. Tarsem Singh reported in (2008) 3 SCC 648).
7. It is found from the contention in the writ petition that there is delay in disbursement of the gratuity and arrear pension amount. It is the bounden duty of the State to disburse all pensionary benefits to the employee forthwith, failing which the employee is entitled to interest
on the aforesaid amount. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to interest on the aforesaid amount.
8. Accordingly, respondent no. 2, the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, West Bengal and respondent no.4, the Treasury Officer, Jalpaiguri-II are directed to disburse the interest at the rate of @ 8% per annum on the gratuity and arrear of pension from the date following the date of retirement of the concerned employee till the date of actual payment. Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
9. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner is directed to communicate this order to respondent no. 2, the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, West Bengal and respondent no.4, the Treasury Officer, Jalpaiguri-II, for necessary compliance. 10 With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition being WPA 945 of 2026 is disposed of.
11. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegation made in the writ petition is deemed to be not admitted.
12. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
13. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of.
14. There shall be no order as to costs.
15. All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
16. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)