Akram Ali@Akram Ali Miah And ORS v. The State Of West Bengal

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

02.07.2026 Ct No.5 Item No.10 S.K.

CRM (A) 371 of 2026 In Re:- An application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, And In Re: Akram Ali & Akram Ali Miah & Ors.

.....

Petitioners Mr. Hillol Saha Poddar ....For the Petitioners Mr. Avrojyoti Das, ld. APP Mr. Raj Kumar Mitra Mr. Tapas Prasad ......For the State

1. According to the learned advocate for the petitioners, the present complaint is the result of political vengeance, which has been lodged during the period of election against 31 random persons, amongst whom 3 accused persons had preferred the instant application praying for anticipatory bail.

2. The State has raised serious objection to such prayer on the ground of availability of injury report which, according to the learned advocate for the State, shows about injuries of the nature from serious to grievous.

3. Perused the injury report which duly corroborated the submission as regards the nature of injury. However, no specific or direct allegation has been leveled against any accused persons to have inflicted injury as revealing. Such

nature of vague allegation does not warrant or obviate the petitioner's custody.

4. Hence considering as above, the bail prayer of the petitioners is allowed.

5. In the event of arrest the petitioners shall be granted bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata in connection with Police Station Case No. 263 of 2026. The petitioners shall comply with the condition under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and shall cooperate with investigation in all possible way. They shall not intimidate witnesses in any manner and shall not tamper with the evidence of the case in any manner whatsoever.

6.

C.D be returned.

(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)