Mijanur Haque v. The State Of West Bengal

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI 22.05.2024. C.R.M. (A) 418 of 2024 14/tkm In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Dinhata P.S case no.

of dated 12.2.2024 under sections 341/323/325/326/379/506/34 IPC And In Re : Mijanur Haque ...petitioner Mr. Partha Pratim Sarkar Mr. Sudip Guho ...for the Petitioner Mr. Abhijit Sarkar Mr. Tapan Bhattachaerjee Mr. Dhiman Shil ...for the State 1.

Petitioner contends he has been falsely implicated. Co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail. He prays for similar relief.

2.

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3.

We have considered the material on record including the statement of injured. He stated petitioner had assaulted him resulting in fracture of both his legs. He was hospitalized.

4.

In view of the aforesaid materials on record we are of the opinion petitioner does not stand on the same footing with co-accused who have been granted anticipatory bail and his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)