Supriyo @ Supriya Das @ Gopal v. The State Of West Bengal And ANR.

12.06.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.48 CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI Ct.No.2 CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION dc.

C.R.R. 222 of 2025 In the matter of : Supriyo @ Supriya Das @ Gopal ... Petitioner.

Ms. Rishita Chakraborty ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Ujjwal Luksom ... For the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not inclined to proceed with the instant revisional application and prays for liberty to file afresh after receipt of the documents under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Mr. Ujjwal Luksom, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears for the State, is directed to represent the State. His appointment may be regularised by the concerned authorities.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this revisional application upon Mr. Luksom, learned advocate for the State.

In view of the submissions so advanced, the revisional application being CRR 222 of 2025 is dismissed as not pressed.

Pending connected application, if any, is consequently disposed of.

Certified copies be returned to the learned advocate-onrecord of the petitioner on the same being replaced by photostat copies.

All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)