← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/880/2021disposed

Kanak Das And ORS v. The State Of West Bengal

2021-09-24Hon'Ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty,Hon'Ble Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay2 pages

CIRCUIT BENCH OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT AT JALPAIGURI 24.09.2021 Court No.01 rpan /19 C.R.M. 880 of 2021 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure;

And In Re : Kanak Das & 5 Others - Petitioners.

Mr. Sudip Guha ... for the petitioners.

Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, Mr. Saikat Chatterjee ... for the State.

Apprehending arrest in connection with Dinhata Police Station Case No.117 of dated 15.03.2021 under Sections 448/427/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, read with Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act, the petitioners have filed the present application.

The learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that there was a political rivalry amongst the parties and the petitioners have been falsely implicated. The allegations are omnibus in nature and in view thereof, custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary.

Mr. Sarkar, learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the petitioners' prayer and draws our attention to the statements of the witnesses, as recorded under Section 161 of the Code. He, however, submits that there was an attempt on the part of the petitioners to assault the de facto complainant.

We have heard the learned advocates and considered the materials in the case diary. Prima facie, in view of the political rivalry

amongst the parties, false implication of the petitioners cannot be totally ruled out and there is no likelihood that the petitioners would flee from justice. As such, we are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, 1. Kanak Das, 2. Ajit Mahanta, 3. Niranjan Barman, 4. Alimuddin Miya, 5. Nilambar Barman and 6. Apu Mahanta shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM 880 of 2021 is, thus, allowed.

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)