Dr. Gostho Bihari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal And ORS

12.12.19 Ct. No. 2 Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Jurisdiction W.P.A. 997 of 2019 Dr. Gostho Bihari Das -VersusSri Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors.

Mr. Sunil Kumar sarkar ...For the Petitioner Mr. Goutam Lahiri ...For Respondent Nos. 1-6 Mr. Kumar Shantanu Mr. Soumya Dasgupta ...For Respondent Nos. 7-9 This is an application under Article 226 of the akb Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities upon his complaint lodged against the private respondents on November 11, 2019.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation submits that action shall be taken in due course.

I have heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties.

After having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the Commissioner, Siliguri Municipal Corporation should act in accordance with law and carry out an inspection and thereafter proceed in accordance with law in an expeditious manner. With the aforesaid observation the writ petition is disposed of.

Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents.

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis. ( Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)