Calcutta High CourtCRM(A)/335/2025dismissed

Riaj Mia@Rahaman And ORS v. The State Of West Bengal

2025-06-12Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

12.06.2025 Item no. 22.

Court No.2.

Rakib In the High Court at Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction CRM (A) 335 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dinhata Women Police Station Case No. 34 of 2025 Dated 19.04.2025 under Sections 115(2)/109(1)/351(2)49 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Riaj Mia @ Rahaman & Ors.

......Petitioners.

Mr. Sudip Guha, Mr. Sandip Guha Roy, Mr. Ananda Pual.

......for the Petitioners.

Mr. Nilay Chakraborty, Ld. APP, Mr. Bhaskar Das.

......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that there are case and counter case inter se the parties, while the petitioners have been arraigned in connection with the Dinhata Women Police Station case no. 34 of 2025 dated 19.04.2025. On the other hand at the instance of the petitioner no.1 Dinhata Police Station case no. 197/2025 has been registered for investigation. Learned advocate also submits that the present petitioners are innocent villagers who have been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. As such there custodial interrogation may not be warranted.

Consequently they may be favoured with an order of anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the Case Dairy along with medical report.

I have seen the background of the case which has its genesis in Dinhata Women Police Station case no. 25/25 dated 18.03.2025. The factual foundation of the FIR of the present case is that in connection with P.S. Case no. 25/25 when one of the injured opposed the prayer for bail the same led to the consequential cause of the injury suffered by the two ladies. Having regard to the background of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, CRM (A) 335 of 2025 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)