Barnali Roy v. State Of West Bengal

02.01.2020 Sl No.37 AP CRM 12384 of 2019 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 23.12.2019 in connection with Dinhata Women P.S.

Case No.

of dated 23.10.2019 under Sections 498(A)/307/325/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re: Barnali Roy ... ... Petitioner.

Mr. Pronojit Roy ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mr. Avik Ghatak ... ... for the State.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she is the sister-in-law of the de facto complainant and resides elsewhere for her education. Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)