Mahammad Ali And ANR v. The State Of West Bengal

16.06.2025 Serial no. 32 [G.S.D] CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

CRM (A) 361 of 2025 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/ 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Dinhata P.S. Case No. 216 of dated 28.04.2025 under sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/3(5) of the BNS corresponding to Sections 341/323/325/326/34 of the IPC. -AndIn the matter of : Mahammad Ali & Anr.

... Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudip Guha Mr. Sandip Guha Roy Mr. Ananda Paul ... for the petitioner(s) Mr. Sourav Ganguly Mr. Dhiman Sil ... for the State Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent of the charges and they have been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. Further, it has been contended that the petitioner no.2 is a student and he has been falsely implicated in the case although he is not named in the FIR.

Learned advocate for the State, on the other hand, submits that there are specific overt act attributed to both

the petitioners which will find its place in the medical documents/injury report.

I have considered the injury report and having regard to the nature of the injuries which are reflected therein as also the complicity of the present petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is Rejected.

Accordingly, CRM(A) 361 of 2025 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)