Bijoy Saha v. The State Of West Bengal

19.06.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.41 CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI Ct.No.2 dc.

C.R.M. (A) 410 of 2025 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Madarihat Police Station Case No. 56 of 2025 dated 06.05.2025 under Sections 25/29/21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

And In Re :

Bijoy Saha ... Petitioner.

Mr. Sayan De, Ms. Esha Acharya, Mr. Sampad Das, Mr. Rimik Chakraborty ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Nilay Chakraborty, APP, Mr. Tapan Bhattacharjee ... For the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner has been arrested. As such, the application has become infructuous.

Learned advocate for the State is present.

In view of the aforesaid, CRM(A) 410 of 2025 is dismissed as infructuous.

Learned Special Court will consider the application for bail of the petitioner independent of any observation made by this Court while disposing of this application for anticipatory bail.

All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)