Tapan Kr. Barman @ Tapan Kumar Barman v. The State Of West Bengal And ANR

07.07.2025 Item No.25 Ct.No.02 rc.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION C.R.M. (A) 425 of 2025 In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Rajganj Police Station Case No. 101 of 2025 dated 28.03.2025.

And In Re :

Tapan Kumar Barman ... Petitioner Mr. Bikash Singha ... for the Petitioner Mr. Kallol Acharjee Mr. Dhiman Sil ... for the State Mr. Bibek Tarafder Mr. Rishita Chakraborty ..for the defacto complainant Heard learned counsels for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated.

Learned counsels for the State and the defacto complainant oppose the prayer.

I have considered the material on record.

Considering the nature and gravity of the offence and prima facie involvement of the petitioner therein, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)