Dipankar Barai @ Dipankar Chik Baraik v. The State Of West Bengal

22.07.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No. 11 CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI Ct. No. 03 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION RUP rejected C.R.M.(A) 543 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Dipankar Barai @ Dipankar Chik Baraik. ...... petitioner Mr. Anirban Banerjee.

....for the petitioners Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, (VC) Ld. APP.

Mr. Subhasish Misra.

....for the State

1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail by submitting that petitioner will cooperate with the investigation and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has submitted that investigating officer already seized the pendrive to substantiate the allegation of provocation delineated in the FIR.

3. At this nascent stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

4. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected.

5. As a sequel, the application being C.R.M. (A) 543 of 2025 stands disposed of.

6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

7. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance of the requisite formalities.

(Bibhas Ranjan De. J.)