← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(A)/641/2025allowed

Bhala Saha @ Bhulu Saha And ANR. v. The State Of West Bengal

2025-09-02Hon'Ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma2 pages

02.09.2025 Ct. No.3 SL No.26 Mujahid (Allowed) Calcutta High Court In The Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri CRM (A) 641 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.396 of dated 18.07.2025 under Sections 189(2)/189(4)/221/223/224/121(1)/109/62(2) of the BNS, 2023.

And In the matter of: Bhola Saha @ Bulu Saha & Anr. ....Petitioners Mr. Bikash Singha, Mr. Aniruddha Taradar ...for the petitioners Mr. Kallol Acharjee, Mr. Biswarup Ray ...for the State 1.

Learned counsel for the State submits that allegedly the accused persons attacked the police party and inflicted injuries and obstructive them in the discharge of official duties. 2.

Learned counsel for the State has fairly submitted that injuries are simple in nature.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in fact it was a quarrel between the workers of two political parties. He further submits that the petitioner have been wrongly named and has nothing to do so of the offence.

4.

The court has considered the submissions, the injuries are simple in nature. The charge-sheet has already been filed. 5.

In the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupess Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions that they shall join the investigation as and when directed the Investigating Officer and shall not threaten, intimidate or tamper the witness in any manner whatsoever.

6.

The application for anticipatory bail is thus, disposed of. 7.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)