Amulya Singha v. The State Of West Bengal

12.09.2025 Ct.No.3 Sl. No.1 Mujahid Calcutta High Court In The Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri CRM (A) 658 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, in connection with Matigara P.S. Case No.551 of 2025 dated 23.08.2025 under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/351(2) of the BNS, 2023.

And In the matter of: Amulya Singha ... Petitioner Ms. Pratusha Dutta Chowdhury, Ms. Sunayna Parveen Ms. Riya Agarwal, Mr. Bappaditya Roy, Mr. Mantu Mandal ...for the petitioner Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, Ld. APP, Mr. Sourav Ganguly ...for the State Mr. Maynak Roy, Mr. Sourav Lohari ...for the de facto complainant 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 4th September, 2025, petitioner has duly joined the investigation twice as and when called by the I.O. 2.

Learned counsel for the State has affirmed the same. 3.

Perusal of the power of attorney in C.D. indicates that petitioner has been authorized to negotiate the intending the purchaser/purchasers and to enter into any agreement for sale and to receive the advance money or part consideration or entire consideration as well to execute the said deed.

4.

Learned counsel for the de facto complainant has however opposed the pre-arrest bail on the ground that she is not received the amount.

5.

The entire case revolves around the covenants of power of attorney. This may require thorough investigation. Petitioner has duly joined the investigation.

6.

Taking into account, facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is admitted to anticipatory bail. 7.

Thus, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

8.

Accoridnlgy, the petitioner is admitted to pre-arrest bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupess Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions that petitioner shall join the investigation as and when directed by the Investigating Officer and shall not threaten, intimidate or tamper the witness in any manner whatsoever. 9.

The application for anticipatory bail is thus, disposed of. 10.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)