Dipak Paul @ Pappu And ANR. v. The State Of West Bengal

04.09.2025 Ct. No.3 Sl. No.25 Mujahid Calcutta High Court In The Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri CRM (A) 662 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Siliguri P.S. Case No.526 of 2025 dated 11.08.2025 under Sections 189/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

And In the matter of: Dipak Paul @ Pappu & Anr.

....Petitioners Mr. Subhasish Misra ...for the petitioners Mr. Ujjwal Luksom, Mr. Sagnik Sankar Sikdar ...for the State 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the uncle and aunt of the alleged principal offender who is in custody. Learned counsel submits that the deceased victim had committed suicide by hanging as allegedly the girl who was in relation with the deceased started ignoring. 2.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioners had also abated the suicide. The gist of the FIR as indicated in memo of evidence indicates that deceased had committed suicide as allegedly the girl was ignoring her and mentally tortured.

3.

In the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupess Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions that they shall join the investigation as and when directed the Investigating Officer and shall not threaten, intimidate or tamper the witness in any manner whatsoever.

4.

The application for anticipatory bail is thus, disposed of. 5.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)