Rubi Roy v. The State Of West Bengal

09.09.2025 Ct. No.3 Sl. No.50 Mujahid Calcutta High Court In The Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri CRM (A) 681 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Dhupguri P.S. Case No.222 of dated 15/06/2025 under Sections 329(4)/117(2)/118(2)/109(1)/351(3)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Rubi Roy ....Petitioner Mr. Santanu Bhowmik, Ms. Rinka Chakraborty ...for the petitioner Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, Ld. APP, Dr. Arjun Chowdhury ...for the State 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged incident is of 30th May, 2025 and the present FIR was lodged on 14th June, 2025. Learned counsel further submits that in fact the de facto complainant was the aggressor and the petitioner made a complaint before the police on 1st June, 2025 and a police station case no.201/2025 dated 1st June, 2025 under Sections 329(4)/115(2)/118/118(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS. Learned counsel submits that subsequently the present was case was lodged falsely.

2.

Learned counsel for the State has fairly submitted that injuries were simple in nature. Learned counsel also submits that the charge-sheet has been filed only for causing simple injury besides other offences.

3.

Taking into account, facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is pre-arrest bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupess Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions that petitioner shall join the investigation as and when directed by the Investigating Officer and shall not threaten, intimidate or tamper the witness in any manner whatsoever.

4.

The application for anticipatory bail is thus, disposed of. 5.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)