Rajibul Miya@Rajibul Islam And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

23.09.2022 Serial no. 01 [Dd] (Anticipatory Bail) (Allowed)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRM (A) 566 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Falakata Police Station Case No. 398 of 2022 dated 12.07.2022 under Sections 341/323/325/326/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Rajibul Miya @ Rajibul Islam & Ors. ... ... Petitioners Mr. Abhimanyu Banerjee, Mr. Arnab Saha, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Aditishankar Chakraborty, ld. APP Mr. Ujjwal Luksom, Mr. Biswarup Roy, Advocates ... ...For the State The injury report of the victims does not suggest that the victims suffered grievous hurt.

Apparently, there was a scuffle with regard to issues relating to a school.

In such circumstances, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the

Investigating Officer as and when called for till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. CRM (A) 566 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)