Buddhiswar Mondal And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

17.11.2022 Serial no.3 Aloke Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri CRM (A) 693 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Dhupguri Police Station Case No. 296 of 2022 dated 14.05.2022 under Sections 448/302/324/325/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Buddhiswar Mondal & Ors. ... ... Petitioners Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh, Advocate Ms. Sutanuka Chowdhury, Advocate Ms. Sompurna Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Sourav Mondal, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, Advocate Mr. Ujjwal Luksom, Advocate Mr. Aniruddha Biswas, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

The police are investigating a murder case.

The postmortem report of the victim suggests that the victim died due to the injuries suffered.

There is a statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the injured widow of the victim implicating all the petitioners in the incident. In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. CRM (A) 693 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)