Injamul Alam @ Enjamul Islam v. The State Of West Bengal

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH

AT JALPAIGURI 15.12.2025 Court No.01 Item No.11 Avijit Mitra CRM (A) 800 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; And In Re: Injamul Alam @ Enjamul Islam -Petitioner Mr. Sandip Guha Roy, Mr. Ananda Paul ...for the Petitioner Mr. Kallol Acharjee, Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, Mr. Sagnik Sankar Sikdar ...for the State Apprehending arrest in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No.429 of 2025 dated 08.05.2025 under Sections 329(4)/118(2)/109/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the present application has been preferred. Mr. Guha Roy, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the allegations are in the abstract. Upon completion of investigation, chargesheet has also been submitted and as such custodial interrogation may not be necessary. Mr. Acharjee, learned advocate appearing for the State opposes such contention of the petitioner and draws the attention of this Court to the injury report and the statement of the victim.

Having heard the learned advocates and considering the materials on record, the nature of accusations, the gravity of the offence, the role attributed to the petitioner and the injury reports, I am of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary moreso when upon completion of investigation chargesheet has also been submitted. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner, namely, Injamul Alam @ Enjamul Islam shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

It is further directed that the petitioner shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

It is made clear that in the event the petitioner fails to comply with any of the aforesaid directions, without justifiable cause, the learned Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the petitioner's bail without any further reference to this Court. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 800 of 2025, is disposed of.

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)