Tanik Baria Raju @ Raju Baria @ Monaj Roy v. The State Of West Bengal And ANR

05.01.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.27 CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI Ct.No.3 dc.

Rejected C.R.M. (A) 905 of 2025 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Tufanganj Police Station Case No. 429 of 2025 dated 16.07.2025 under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In Re :

Tanik Baria Raju @ Raju Baria @ Monaj Roy ... Petitioner.

Mr. Hillol Saha Podder ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Ujjwal Luksom, Ms. Namrata Das ... For the State.

Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be kept with the record.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that both the petitioner and the victim are major and the case has been instituted when the relationship between the petitioner and the victim became bitter.

Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the case diary.

I have considered the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. Records reflect that the petitioner was married at the time when he entered the relationship with the victim. Considering the same and the

fact that promise to marry from the very inception was fake, I am of the view that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 905 of 2025, is, thus, dismissed.

All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)