← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/3378/2022disposed

Sabit Kumar Guha v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS

2023-01-05Hon'Ble Justice Aniruddha Roy2 pages

Court No. 2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Circuit Bench At Jalpaiguri Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side W.P.C.R.C. 2 of 2025 + CAN 1 of 2025 + CAN 2 of 2025 + CAN 3 of 2025 Sabit Kumar Guha VS Mr. Alapan Bandyopadhyay & Ors.

in W.P.A. 3378 of 2022 + CAN 1 of 2023 Sabit Kumar Guha VS The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Anirban Banerjee ..... for the petitioner Mr. Kishore Dutta, ld. Adv. General Ms. Sumita Shaw Ms. Sharmistha Ghosh Mr. Ranit Ray .... For alleged contemnor Nos. 1, 2 & 3 Mr. Victor Chatterjee .... For alleged contemnor No. 2 Mr. Jayjit Choudhury, ld. Addl. Adv. General Mr. Nabankur Paul Ms. Sunanya Prasad .... For the State Mr.

Anirban Banerjee, learned advocate 21.3.2025 (Item No. 1) (AB) appears for the petitioner.

Mr. Kishore Dutta, learned Advocate General for the State appears for alleged contemnor No. 1. Mr. Nabankur Paul, learned advocate led by Mr. Jayjit Choudhury, learned Additional Advocate General for the State appears through virtual mode and submits that, the payment which has already been disbursed as recorded in the order dated

February 11, 2025 by the alleged contemnor no. 1 in turn has been credited to the bank account of the writ petitioner being the petitioner in the contempt application.

Mr.

Anirban Banerjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has confirmed that the petitioner has received the money but the petitioner claims further interest. So far as the claim of interest is concerned, is not within the domain of the contempt petition. However, if the petitioner is legally entitled to get interest he may take appropriate steps in accordance with law.

In view of the submissions recorded above made on behalf of the parties, nothing further survives in this contempt proceeding.

Accordingly, rule issued stands discharged.

The contempt proceeding being W.P.C.R.C. 2 of 2025 stands dropped and closed.

The contempt application being W.P.C.R.C. 2 of 2025 accordingly stands disposed of.

Consequently, the applications being CAN 1 of 2025, CAN 2 of 2025 and CAN 3 of 2025 stand disposed of.

(Aniruddha Roy, J.)