← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(A)/766/2022allowed

Sushanta Bhattacharjee And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2022-12-20Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

20.12.2022 Serial no. 04 [Dd] (Anticipatory Bail) (Allowed) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT In The Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side CRM (A) 766 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Alipurduar Woman Police Station Case No. 47 of 2021 dated 03.04.2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 551/21 under Sections 498A/307 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 & 4 Dowry Prohibition Act.

-AndIn the matter of : Sushanta Bhattacharjee & Ors. ... ... Petitioners Ms. Minoti Gomes, Mr. Apurba Kumar Datta, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Ujjwal Luksum, Mr. Tapan Bhattacharjee, (via video conference) Advocates ... ...For the State Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that there are previous proceedings for maintenance as well as for divorce.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary including the statement of the de facto complainant recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. There is a divorce proceedings pending. There is a proceeding for maintenance initiated at the behest of the de facto complainant. The present police complaint was lodged subsequent to those proceedings.

The allegations appear to be omnibus and general in nature.

In such circumstances, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner nos. 1 and 4 shall report before the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and petitioner nos. 2, 3 & 5 shall cooperate with the investigation till its completion and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. CRM (A) 766 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)