Bikash Barai v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS
November 24, 2023 Sl. No. 5 Court No.2 s.biswas In the Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side WPA 2574 of 2023 Bikash Barai vs.
The State of West Bengal and others Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury Mr. Gopal Roy ... for the petitioner Mr. Subir Kumar Saha Ms. Bedashruti Bose ...for the State Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh ...for the SSC Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.
The Central School Service Commission rejected the petitioner's prayer for transfer on the ground that the petitioner was a single subject teacher.
The petitioner submits that when he applied for transfer, the amended Rules of 2015 had not come into effect. The rule for consideration of the teachers strength and the roll strength etc. and the embargo on the transfer of a single subject teacher had come into operation only after September 8, 2021. The petitioner relies on certain orders of the Division Bench of this Court, by which the School Service Commission was
directed to consider the case of general transfer of the appellants therein, on the basis of the Transfer Rules of 2015. The petitioner submits that vide a later notification, an embargo which had been put on transfer of a single teacher, which could not be applied in the case of the petitioner.
Under such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed with direction upon the Chairman, West Bengal School Service Commission to decide the prayer of the petitioner for transfer which was filed during subsistence of Transfer Rules of 2015, strictly in accordance with such Rules. The decision shall be taken in the off-line mode and the decision shall be communicated to the petitioner with reasons. It also appears that there are rules which now provide a mechanism to deal with a situation in case a single subject teacher seeks transfer.
Outright rejection is not permissible. Alternative arrangement is to be made by the concerned District Inspector, as per the prevailing rules.. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order.
The earlier order of rejection of the prayer of the petitioner is set aside.
The writ petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Parties are to act on the basis of the server copy of the order.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)