Md.Nasir@Sahil v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

03.01.2025 SK/ct 1 In the High Court at Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri sl no. 51 CRM(DB)/721/2024 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Siliguri Police Station Case No.74 of 2024 Dated 30.07.2024 under Section 6 of the POCSO Act 2012. In Re : MD.NASIR@SAHIL...... petitioner Ms. Rima Sarkar, ....for defacto complainant.

Mr. Nilay Chakraborty Mr. Tapan Bhattacharjee, ...for the state None appears on behalf of the petitioner nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. The matter has been adjourned on 23 December, 2024. It is obvious that the petitioner is neither interested nor serious in proceeding with this application and has sought for an adjournment with ulterior intent to forum shop. In view of the repeated non-appearance of the petitioner, CRM(DB)/721/2024 stands dismissed for default. The defacto complainant is represented. The State is also represented.

It is submitted on behalf of the State and the defacto complainant that the allegation against the petitioner are serious and there is sufficient incriminating materials on record insofar as the petitioner is concerned.

(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.) (UDAY KUMAR, J.)