← Library
Calcutta High CourtITA/9/2017dismissed

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2,Kolkata v. M/S. Concast Steel & Power Ltd. @ Sps Steels & Power Ltd.

2022-11-10Hon'Ble Justice T. S. Sivagnanam,Hon'Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya2 pages

OD - 14

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/9/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATA Vs M/S. CONCAST STEEL & POWER LTD. @ SPS STEELS & POWER LTD. BEFORE :

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Dated : NOVEMBER 10, 2022.

Appearance:

Mr. Prithu Dhudheria, Adv.

...for appellant Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv., ...for respondent The Court :- This appeal filed by the revenue under section 206A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] challenging the order dated 30.06.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal "B" Bench Kolkata in ITA 1391 & 1414/Kol/2011 for the assessment order in 2008-09. The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law :- i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, conclusion arrived at by the learned Tribunal that in respect of the amount of Rs.1,13,65,623/- there is no evidence proving that the entries recorded in the documents found during course of search is over and above the income as already declared by the assessee at Rs.6.84 crores as undisclosed income where the assessee has accepted the addition in assessment and has not appealed against it, is perverse ?

As submitted by the learned standing Counsel appearing for appellant and as could be seen from the records placed before this Court the tax effect in the instant case

is much less than the threshold limit fixed by the C.B.D.T. in its circular. Therefore, the appeal cannot be pursued by the revenue. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed on the low tax effect. The question which was admitted for consideration is left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) Pkd/GH