← Library
Calcutta High CourtAPOT/15/2024dismissed

Marco Polo Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. v. Amit Tiwari And ORS.

2024-08-14Hon'Ble Justice Harish Tandon,Hon'Ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas2 pages

OD -3 APOT/15/2024 with CS/221/2013 IA No.GA/1/2024

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MARCO POLO RESTAURANT PVT. LTD.

-VersusAMIT TIWARI AND ORS.

BEFORE :

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HARISH TANDON And THE HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS Date : 14th August, 2024.

Appearance :

Mr. Utpal Bose, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Adv.

Mr. Siddhartha Banerjee, Adv.

Ms. Suchismita Ghosh Chatterjee, Adv.

Mr. Prasanta Naskar, Adv.

Mr. Abir Lal Chakraborty, Adv.

...for the appellant.

Mr. Suman Dutt, Adv.

Mr. Satadeep Bhattacharyya, Adv.

Mr. Shreyashi Das, Adv.

Mr. Himangsu Bhawsinghha, Adv.

Mr. Rohan Kumar Thakur, Adv.

..for the respondents.

The Court : The instant appeal arises from an order rejecting the application filed by the appellant seeking to withdraw the order more particularly the observations recording the consent given before the Court in relation to a deposit of a sum of Rs.25 lakhs. Since the said amount has already been deposited in terms of the order dated 15th April, 2024, in our opinion, the initial

cause of action is no longer surviving and, therefore, there is no justification in keeping the said appeal alive.

Accordingly, the appeal (APOT/15/2024) is hereby dismissed.

Consequently, the connected application also stands dismissed. For the purpose of bringing clarity into the issues, it is made clear that the appellate Court has no occasion to go into the merits of the contentions nor have gone into the stand taken by the appellant that the consent was not given or given without any instruction from the appellant and, therefore, such observations shall not be construed as sacrosanct. (HARISH TANDON, J.) (PRASENJIT BISWAS, J.) A/s.