← Library
Calcutta High CourtAPO/9/2024disposed

Chirantan Housing Private Limited v. Youdhister Kumar Dhanania Alias Youdhister Kumar Agarwal

2024-08-01Hon'Ble Justice I. P. Mukerji,Hon'Ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury2 pages

OD-17 ORDER SHEET IA NO. GA/3/2024 WITH CS/29/2016 In APO/9/2024

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CHIRANTAN HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED

VERSUS

YOUDHISTER KUMAR DHANANIA ALIAS YOUDHISTER KUMAR AGARWAL

BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN AND The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY Date : 27h November, 2024.

Appearance:

Mr. Tanmoy Sett, Adv.

Mr. Atish Ghosh, Adv.

Ms. Antara Dey, Adv.

...for the appellant Mr. Paritosh Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Sukreet Mukherjee, Adv.

Mr. K.K. Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Gyan Prakash, Adv.

...for the respondent The Court: The prayers in the Notice of Motion against the order dated 7th October, 2024 stands diluted by the order dated 25th November, 2024 (wrongly mentioned as 25th October, 2024) by which liberty was given to the present application to inspect the record in terms of the Original Side Rules for inspection of the original documents since the documents to be offered by the plaintiff for inspection are already on record as exhibits.

The applicant seeks a clarification that the timelines prescribed for completion of the various exercises contemplated by the order dated 1st August, 2024 are directory and not mandatory in nature. We find from the order of the Hon'ble Division Bench that the word 'preferably' has been used while the timelines have been framed with regard to the procedural matters and then hearing of the suits. The suit is pending from 2016. It is the duty of the parties to assist the Court in disposing of the matter within the time as mentioned in the order. However, if for some reasons it is not possible, the Court may fix suitable timelines for the trial of the suit. The word 'preferably' cannot be an excuse for either of the parties to delay the hearing of the suit irrespective of the fact that security has been furnished by the defendant.

It will be open for the learned Single Judge to issue a timeline for trial of the suit and such direction should be peremptory in nature. The application is disposed of.

(SOUMEN SEN, J.) (BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J.) bp/R.Bhar