Md Salim Khan And ANR v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation And ORS
OD-2 APOT /62/2023 WPO/3049/2022 IA No.GA/1/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side MD. SALIM KHAN AND ANOTHER.
-VersusKOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
Appearance:
Mr. Arif Ali, Advocate.
Mr. Sarban Bhattacharjee, Advocate ...for the Appellants Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee, Advocate Mr. A. Farmania, Advocate for Kolkata Municipal Corporation.
Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, Advocate, Ms. Susmita Chatterjee, Advocate For State Respondent.
Mr. Farhaduddin, Advocate Ms. Era Ghosh, Advocate For Respondent no. 7 .
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE APURBA SINHA RAY Date: March 21, 2023.
THE COURT: This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated December 13, 2022, whereby the
writ petition of the appellants being WPO/3049/2022 was disposed of.
The appellants approached the learned single Judge for cancellation of an order dated October 28/29, 2021 passed by the Executive Engineer (Building), Borough -VI, Kolkata Municipal Corporation, who was respondent no. 5 in the writ petition.
The first paragraph of the order under appeal reads as follows:
"The writ petitioner has filed the present writ petition praying for implementation of the decision of the Executive Engineer (Civil)/Building/Borough VI, Kolkata Municipal Corporation dated 28th October, 2021."
It appears that the learned Judge was not properly assisted. The writ petition was not for implementation of the order dated March 28/29, 2021 passed by the Executive Engineer. The writ petitioner in fact challenged the said order and prayed for quashing thereof.
Only on the aforesaid ground, we set aside the order and remand the matter for fresh consideration by the learned single Judge having determination to hear the writ petition. We have not gone into the merits of the matter at all. It will be for the learned single Judge to take appropriate decision in the matter upon hearing the parties. Since we have not called for any affidavit, the allegations made in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents.
The appeal and the connected application accordingly stand disposed of.
(ARIJIT BANERJEE, J.) (APURBA SINHA RAY, J.) dg/