← Library
Calcutta High CourtAP/168/2023disposed

Rajesh Baid v. Dipanjan Bhattacharjee Ande ORS

2023-03-29Hon'Ble Justice Shekhar B. Saraf2 pages

ODC 27 ORDER SHEET AP/168/2023

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION RAJESH BAID VS DIPANJAN BHATTACHARJEE ANDE ORS

BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHEKHAR B. SARAF Date: 29th March, 2023.

Appearance:

Mr. Anujit Mookherrji, Adv.

. . .for the petitioner.

Mr. Chayan Gupta, Adv.

. . .for the respondent no.1.

Mr. Nikhilesh Mittal, Adv.

. . .for the respondent no.2.

The Court: Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. This is an application under Section 23(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, I find sufficient reasons for allowing the prayers (a) and (b) of the Notice of Motion. I make it clear that this order is peremptory in nature and no further extension shall be granted.

With the above directions this application being AP/168/2023 is disposed of.

I clarify that the time to file the statement of defence / counter claim shall be extended by a period of four weeks from date. (SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.) sp/