Ansh Overseas Pvt Ltd v. Union Of India And ORS

OD - 102 ORDER SHEET WPO/1713/2022

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE ANSH OVERSEAS PVT LTD VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN Date : 4TH APRIL, 2022.

Appearance:

Mr. Pramit Bag, Adv.

Mr. Brijesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

...for the petitioner Mr. Vipul Kundalia, Adv.

..for the respondents.

The Court : Heard the learned advocates appearing for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned notice dated 20th April, 2021 relating to assessment year 2013-2014 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the name of transferor company on the ground that the noticee has already been amalgamated on 24th May, 2019 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 2018 and the department has been intimated about this amalgamation which is matters of record and such notice in the name of a non-existing company is not tenable in the eye of law since information of such amalgamation has already been given to the respondent on 7th December, 2020 yet the Respondent concerned has not withdrawn the impugned notice.

In support of his contention Mr. Bag, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners has relied on a decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in

the case of Takshashila Realties Pvt. Ltd. Versus Dy Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 2016 SCC OnLine Guj 6462 and specifically relies on Paragraph 10 of the said judgement and also my own order dated 2nd August, 2021 in WPA 1791 of 2020 (Brubeck Resources Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors.).

Considering the submission of the parties, I am of the view that the impugned notices dated 20th April, 2021 (Annexure P-3 to the writ petition) is not tenable in the eye of law and all further action on the basis of said impugned notices also are not tenable in the eye of law and the same are quashed. The writ petition is allowed and the impugned notices are quashed solely on the ground that the impugned notice was issued in the name of non-existing company. However, quashing of this notice will not prevent the respondents from issuing fresh notice in accordance with law. Since no affidavits have been called for, allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have been denied by the respondents. Accordingly, WPO NO. 1713 of 2022 is disposed of. (MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.) Sbghosh