Monoranjan Roy & ORS. v. Dena Bank & ANR.

OD-33

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CS/420/2013 MONORANJAN ROY & ORS.

Versus

DENA BANK & ANR.

BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : January 21, 2022.

[Via Video Conference] The Court: None appears on behalf of the plaintiffs. Nor is any accommodation prayed for on their behalf.

By an order dated 23 December, 2021, this Court had directed the plaintiffs to cure and rectify the defects which had been pointed out during scrutiny of the plaint as far back as in 2013, within a period of one month, subject to payment of costs. This suit has appeared on the returnable date.

It appears from the Report filed by the Department that the plaintiffs have taken no steps in the suit notwithstanding the order dated 23 December, 2021.

Hence, I am of the view that it is evident that the conduct of the plaintiffs has been indolent, casual and negligent. There can be no earthly reason as to why the plaintiffs had taken no steps in curing the defects which had been pointed out during the scrutiny of the plaint by the Department as far back as in 2013.

In the absence of any cause, far less good cause, CS 420 of 2013 stands dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 23 December, 2021 and for non-prosecution.

All interim orders stand automatically vacated. (RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.) RS