Harupati Mridha v. The Tehsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

[CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR] ...

WPA/16/2023 Smt. Harupati Mridha ... Petitioner Vs.

The Tehsildar ... Respondent Ms. Anjili Nag ... for the Petitioner Mr. V.D. Sivabalan Mr. Arun S. Kumar ...for the Respondent January 20, 2023 [MAM] Item No.3 Pursuant to the order dated 16th January, 2023 the learned Advocate representing the Respondent has filed a report dated 19th January, 2023. A copy of the report has been handed over to Ms.

Nag, learned Advocate representing the petitioner.

After going through the said report Ms. Nag, learned Advocate representing the petitioner has prayed for leave to initiate appropriate proceedings against this report dated 19th January, 2023, if so advised.

In view of such submission being made on behalf of the Writ petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of upon granting opportunity to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law, if so advised. The report dated 19th January, 2023 is taken on record. Since no affidavits have been called for the allegations made in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted.

Photostat Certified Copy of this order be supplied to the parties after compliance of all required formalities. ( Saugata Bhattacharyya, J. )