Dipika Rani Biswas v. The Andaman Nicobar Administration And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] ...

CRM(SB)/1/2022 Dipika Rani Biswas ... Petitioner Vs.

The Andaman and Nicobar Administration and another ... Respondents Mr.D.Ilango ... for the petitioner Mr. Sumit Karmakar ... for the respondent no.1 Mr. Gopala Binnu Kumar ... for the respondent no.2 July 29, 2022 [SR] Item No.3 This application has been filed for cancellation of bail of respondent no.2.

At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 submits that the prosecution has already filed an application for cancellation of bail in the Trial Court and as such, the present application is pre-mature.

Learned counsel appearing for the accused-person, that is, respondent no.2, submits that the defacto complainant does not have any locus standi to be heard in such application. Be that as it may, without going into the merits of the application, CRM(SB)/1/2022 is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner/defacto complainant to renew her prayer before the learned Sessions Judge, at the time of hearing of the petition for

cancellation of bail filed by the prosecution, in accordance with law.

No order as to costs.

Let a copy of the present application be served on the learned Advocate for the accused.

( Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J. )