Sarani Topno v. The Superintending Engineer And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] ...

WPA/316/2022 Sarani Topno ... Petitioner Vs.

The Superintendent Engineer and anr.

... Respondents Mr. K. Vijay Kumar ... for the petitioner Mr. Tulsi Lall Mr. Rakesh Kumar ... for the respondents August 24, 2022 [SR] Item No.11 After hearing learned counsel, the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction on the Executive Engineer, Electricity Department, Diglipur, who is the respondent no.2, to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner being part of records within a period of three weeks from the date of communication of this order. The respondent shall take steps in accordance with the representation made, if the petitioner is found eligible, within a period of three weeks from date of representation is received by the respondent. Since affidavit-in-opposition has not been called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted.

( Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)