Shri.Rohit Das v. The State And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** CRR/36/2025 Shri Rohit Das Vs The State and Another Mr. Gopala Binnu Kumar Mrs. Vinita Devi ... for the petitioners Mr. Sumit Kumar Karmakar ... for the State Mrs. Anjili Nag, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Deb Kumar Bawali ... for the respondent No.2 November 4, 2025 [AKB] Item No. 8 The learned advocate representing the petitioner has submitted the written instruction on behalf of the petitioner expressing his unwillingness to proceed with the hearing of the instant revisional application.

Let the said written instruction be kept with the record. Accordingly the instant revisional application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

The learned advocate representing the petitioner is at liberty to agitate the issues reflected in the instant revisional application before the Trial Court, if permissible in law. The Case Diary be returned to the learned advocate representing the State.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)